The Game ranking system on Boardgamegeek.com favors games with a lot of votes by adding 100 “average” dummy votes. This is called Beysian averaging. According the FAQ on BGG this is to prevent a new game from appearing at the top by virtue of a few good reviews (or vice versa). This system severely affects the rankings of small publishers with less than 1000 ratings.
The majority of the Columbia Games block games have average user ratings above 7. But only Hammer of the Scots, EastFront, and Rommel in the Desert are ranked above 7 once the 100 dummy votes are added.
I’d like to see the ranking system changed and I’ve contacted the guys at BGG and expressed my concerns. There is a separate rank listing of wargames which averages the user ratings without dummy votes. This list is helpful (its nice that EastFront is #1) but would still rather a system where no tweaking is necessary. A minimum of 100 rankings before inclusion on the master list ought to be enough to prevent most problems.
In the meantime, I would like to appeal to players of Columbia Games block games to submit your ratings as soon as possible to offset to effect of the dummy votes. To rate a game simply go to its page on boardgamegeek.com. Make sure you’re logged in and scroll down to the bottom to enter your rating. Click submit and you’re all set.


